|
|
Nobody could accuse
the 84 per cent who want to preserve the green belt of being
Nimbys - people who are all in favour of property development,
but Not In My Back Yard. The green belts that surround so many
of our cities are, by definition, in very few people's back
yards, since so few are allowed to live in them. Quite a lot of
those who want to preserve it must be young couples who are
desperate to set up home together, whose troubles would be
greatly eased if the Government or the local council were to
allow the builders to venture further into the belt. Perhaps
some of us - or even most of us - dream that one day we will own
an idyllic house in the countryside. But the great majority of
us realise that we never will. Our love of the green belt is a
selfless love, motivated only by the desire to preserve
something beautiful.
There are many, I know, who believe that we can have all the
housing that we need, without encroaching at all on the green
belt. They say that there is plenty of room for new buildings on
brown-field sites in our inner cities. All we need do is to pack
people in more densely, as the Deputy Prime Minister, John
Prescott, has been doing for years. Build ugly new flats in
places that are already ugly, so the thinking goes, and no harm
is done. But the free-marketeer in me recoils from the idea. Why
should people live in ugly places, stacked up in rabbit-hutches
by government diktat, when almost all of us would prefer a bit
of space to call our own?
God knows, I am better off than most Britons, living in a 4½-bedroom
semi in the London suburbs. But there isn't a day that passes,
when I am queueing for the bathroom behind my wife and four
sons, when I don't wish that we had a little more room, and a
garden more than 12ft wide. If I feel like that, how does my
poor Polish cleaning-lady feel, sharing a single room in south
London with her brother, her boyfriend and his brother? And what
about all those tens of thousands of young people, as desperate
to set up their own homes as their parents are to see the back
of them?
|